0
0
Joe Biden is pissing off everyone these days.
That would now include the members of his Secret Service detail.
Going back to the reports of First Doggie Major having a biting incident, we are now finding out the White House misled everyone about the serious nature of the bites (shocking, I know).
Now I’m Pissed
When the incident was first reported, the media questioned if this was an isolated incident.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki tried to downplay the incident as a minor nip and a one-time deal.
That, however, was far from the case if the gripes from Secret Service agents are to be believed.
Newly released documents show that multiple bites occurred, some rather serious.
This also reportedly happened on eight different occasions.
At the time, Psaki described the incident as “the first family’s younger dog, Major, was surprised by an unfamiliar person and reacted in a way that resulted in a minor injury to the individual.”
One agent responded to another co-worker, “NO I didn’t surprise the dog doing my job by being at [redacted] as the press secretary just said! Now I’m pissed.”
Another agent described a bite from Major, stating the “injury cannot be described in any other term than ‘severe.’”
One of the biting incidents was described, “Without warning or provocation, Major barked loudly at [the agent] … and charged.”
The account went on, “Having no time to seek cover from the attack, [the agent] turned away from the dog as he bit into [redacted] right leg.”
The dog also apparently bit through an overcoat of another agent.
The report stated, “As Major came around the corner, he attacked me unprovoked, tearing the wool overcoat I was wearing that evening.
“This attack occurred through no fault of my own and I could not avoid this unusual circumstance due to the nature and requirements of my position.”
A Secret Service agent was actually reprimanded for describing the incident with too much detail.
A supervisor wrote back, “Please submit with the language that has been approved by [the legal office]. Unless you dispute anything in the verbiage that was presented to you, there shouldn’t be a need to embellish with additional details that aren’t required for approval.”
“If you would like to submit a separate memo to- memorializing the events of 3/6 in great
detail, you certainly may. But your added language on the [form] provides more specificity that what [the legal office] requested. I have been told that if you update the [request] with the approved verbiage, your request will be processed.”
Another report stated that the agent’s description was “excessively detailed and inappropriate.”
Now, I want you to think about this… if this administration is willing to cover up a dog bite to this degree, what else do you think they are hiding from the American people?
