Walz Performed Almost Bad as Joe Biden

Walz
0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 49 Second

The best way to describe what happened to Tim Walz at the great vice presidential debate is calling it a “calm, friendly bloodbath.” Mark Halperin had to declare “it wasn’t as bad as Biden’s debilitated performance in June, but it was close.” The low point came when Kamala’s wing-man proudly declared he has several friends who are school shooters. Twice.

Walz painful to watch

Undecided voters who tuned in to the vice presidential debate are nearly unanimous in saying Walz lost. J.D. Vance won by default as the former Minnesota governor went up in flames like Minneapolis in a looting spree. Newt Gingrich called it “staggeringly one-sided.

Vance, he wrote in retrospect, “was poised, calm, friendly, likable, and in control of the facts and himself.” He did a great job of painting Republicans as normal people, not deplorable MAGA fanatics.

On the other hand, Gingrich points out, “Tim Walz began the debate so nervous it was painful to watch. Then he made a series of mistakes which were cumulatively disqualifying. It was hard to believe he is on a national ticket.” That pretty much sums it up.

Without even mentioning the alleged shady ties to China, he shot himself in the foot over Tienanmen Square. He previously told a bunch of lies about being there when the massacre happened. He got there months after. What he said about it at the debate sealed his political fate.

When asked “why he had lied about being at Tiananmen Square during the 1989 suppression and killing of students demonstrating for democracy,” Walz called himself a “knucklehead” for “simply saying something that was false.

Being the “knucklehead candidate,” Fox News notes, “is not a good way to campaign for the last five weeks before the election.” It makes Kamala and Joe look like the other two stooges.

Walz called himself a “knucklehead” for lying about being at Tiananmen Square.

Sabotage from within

Political pundit Mark Halperin had a scathing analysis. “One can pretend, as most of the Dominant Media does, that Tim Walz was not ‘clobbered‘ by JD Vance, but, he was indeed clobbered.

Pollster Frank Luntz was having a conniption. He posted on social media that “his focus group voted 12 to 2 that Vance had won.” Glen Greenwald noticed a bizarre pattern.

The most bizarre part of that debate was how Tim Walz repeatedly and flagrantly undercut Dems’ core attack on Trump/Vance: that they’re ‘weird,’ freakish dangers wildly out of the mainstream.

Instead, “everything Walz said treated Vance as a totally normal, reasonable, likable colleague.” One who doesn’t lie about trips to China or claim to be friends with school shooters.

Another thing that was clear to viewers, moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan were “obnoxious” and “made the debate a three-on-one proposition against Vance.” When things got heated in the discussion over resource hogging asylum seekers, the moderators cut off both microphones.

Both candidates were doing such a great job of showing why Trump should be in charge of the border, they had to do something. The best Walz could do was spew off a memorized talking point. To Democrats, the best way to deal with the migrant problem is refuse to even talk about it because complaining doesn’t do any good.

About Post Author

Mark Megahan

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
100 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Related Posts