0
0
The January 6 committee delayed its initial schedule for “new” information.
To be honest, this seems more like a planned tactic at this point from its Hollywood producer.
Regardless, the so-called evidence was compelling when the hearing went on air until you really look into it.
Big Problems
The first problem as I see it is that when the committee had former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone in the hot seat, it did not ask him about Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony.
This is relevant because she cited Cipollone in her testimony.
The fact they did not touch upon this is an utter disgrace and one of the reasons fewer people are taking this very seriously at this point.
Secondly, everything we see is hearsay and conjecture, both inadmissible in a court of law.
Watch this report and you will see exactly what I mean…
I think it is pretty evident that this committee is not interested in getting facts, just in painting a picture that was decided when the committee was first formed.
As I stated, if you are not actually investigating what is said, the hearings can be compelling, which would explain Trump’s low polling numbers in a general election matchup against Biden in 2024.
This is a kangaroo court, nothing more.
The only question now remains if enough people are buying it or if they are actually paying attention.
